Niccolo Catini vs Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Sep at 02:38 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Catini vs M. Wei Kang Leong

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

MAS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Catini 1 - 0 Leong
They have played 2 sets in total, with Niccolo Catini winning 2 and Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong winning 0. The last match between Niccolo Catini and Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong was at the M25 Bali, 12-09-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Niccolo Catini getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Catini | 1 |
| Leong | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M25 Bali(09-12-25)
N. Catini vs M. W. K. Leong H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 50.43% (118-116) | Career Total W/L | 52.94% (108-96) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Catini vs M. W. K. Leong Match Preview:
- Second serve performance: Catini has won 38.75% of second serve points recently, while Leong edges ahead with 40.21%. Could this give Leong an advantage in the matchup? It might.
- Return game analysis: Catini has won 46.83% of opponent's second serve points, whereas Leong leads slightly with 49.69%. However, Catini outperforms on first serve returns with 29.26% compared to Leong's 25.59%.
- Handling pressure points: In recent form, Catini has saved 47.68% of breakpoints, but Leong surpasses this with a 55.1% breakpoint save rate. Could this make Leong more resilient under pressure?
- Match performance history: Catini has a win rate of 51.61% over the last year, slightly lower than Leong’s 52.31%. Does this indicate a closer contest?
- Preferred surfaces: Both have their best surface win percentage on Hard courts, with Catini at 57% and Leong at 54%. They struggle more on Clay.
- Competitive level: In Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, Catini clocks in at a 52.46% win rate versus Leong's 56.1%. Does this suggest Leong has the upper hand at this level?
- Opponent quality: Catini commonly faces higher-ranked opponents (avg rank 405.71) compared to Leong (avg rank 513.12). Could this mean Catini is more tested?
- Deciding set performance: Catini has an impressive 62% win rate in deciding sets, surpassing Leong’s 53% rate.
- Recent break point conversion: Leong has converted more break points recently at 36.99%, compared to Catini’s 33.11%.
Editorial Prediction (September 12, 2025, UTC):
Both players show strong performance metrics in different areas, making this an intriguing contest. Catini’s advantage in first serve returns and deciding sets suggests solid resilience in key moments.
Leong, however, seems to have a slight edge with better second serve performance, break point conversion, and ability to save breakpoints. This could prove crucial in a closely matched battle.
Considering recent trends and comparative statistics, Leong is well-positioned to emerge victorious in this upcoming tennis match.
Niccolo Catini vs Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Catini vs M. W. K. Leong H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:28:59 | Average Match Time | 1:28:59 |
| 44% (23/52) | 1st Serve % | 67% (35/52) |
| 87% (20/23) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (19/35) |
| 48% (14/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (5/17) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (1/4) |
| 54% (28/52) | Return Points Win % | 35% (18/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Catini Recent Matches Played
M. W. K. Leong Recent Matches Played

N. Catini vs M. W. K. Leong Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.43% (118/116) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.94% (108/96) |
| 50.66% (268/261) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.28% (244/214) |
| 51.53% (2525/2375) | Games Win/Loss | 51.99% (2195/2027) |
| 56.82% (25/19) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.19% (100/88) |
| 48.86% (86/90) | Clay Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 50.00% (7/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53.85% (7/6) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.43 |
| 258 | Aces Total | 881 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 386 | Total Double Faults | 586 |
| 1:22:52 | Average Match Time | 1:36:25 |
| 383.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 458.9 |
| 68% (7990/11797) | 1st Serve % | 61% (7735/12587) |
| 61% (4880/7990) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (5263/7735) |
| 47% (1799/3807) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2190/4852) |
| 45% (607/1342) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (630/1390) |
| 43% (5060/11781) | Return Points Win % | 43% (5332/12458) |
| 0.00% (0/4) | Challenger W/L | 47.06% (16/18) |
| 51.30% (118/112) | Futures W/L | 54.12% (92/78) |
| 50% (115/229) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (105/201) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 35% (14/40) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 41% (22/54) |
| 47% (29/62) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (21/51) |
| 84% (128/107) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (106/95) |
| 16% (128/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (106/11) |
| 9% (106/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (98/13) |